切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 638 -645. doi: 10.3877/ cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2024.05.012

综述

固定平台单髁置换假体合适位置的研究进展
王相迎1, 杨长生1, 曲铁兵2,()   
  1. 1.250117 济南,山东第一医科大学附属肿瘤医院,山东省肿瘤医院骨软外科
    2.100068 北京,中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院骨与关节疾病诊疗中心
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-02 出版日期:2024-10-01
  • 通信作者: 曲铁兵

Research progress in optimal position of fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Xiangying Wang1, Changsheng Yang1, Tiebing Qu2,()   

  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic Oncology Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Science,Jinan 250117, China
    2.School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing BoAi Hospital, Capital Medical University,Beijing 100068, China
  • Received:2024-02-02 Published:2024-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Tiebing Qu
引用本文:

王相迎, 杨长生, 曲铁兵. 固定平台单髁置换假体合适位置的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 638-645.

Xiangying Wang, Changsheng Yang, Tiebing Qu. Research progress in optimal position of fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 638-645.

膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)已经成为影响老年人生活质量的重要因素。研究显示早期KOA主要局限在单一间室。对于单间室KOA,单髁膝关节置换(UKA)已经成为重要的治疗手段。与全膝关节置换(TKA)相比,UKA优势明显,但假体的远期生存率较低。在影响UKA假体生存率的因素中,假体的位置是其中重要的因素,因此在手术过程中选择合适的假体位置至关重要。本研究通过在Pubmed、Medline、ClinicalKey数据库中检索关键词“unicompartmental knee arthroplasty””、“fixed-bearing”、“prosthesis”、“appropriate position”;以及“中国知网”、“万方”、“维普” 数据库中检索“单髁置换”、“固定平台”、“假体”、“合适位置”搜集整理了近些年来相关文献。总结归纳出股骨假体在冠状面上的位置应该放置在股骨髁中心位置、在矢状面上可以放置在屈曲5°至伸直10°之间、在横断面上可以放在内外旋3°之间;胫骨假体在冠状面上可以放置在中立位或者轻度内翻位、在矢状面上可以放置在0°~8°之间,但是也要将患者自身的解剖后倾角考虑在内;在横断面上选择内外旋3°之间;而术前术后关节线高度的差异应该控制在2 mm之内。通过上述的归纳总结,期望可以给临床医生提供参考,提高UKA术中假体放置的精确度,改善假体的远期生存率。

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) has become an important factor affecting the quality of life of the elderly. Studies have shown that early KOA is mainly confined to the single compartment. For unicompartmental KOA, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has become an important treatment. Compared with total knee arthroplasty (TKA), UKA has significant advantages, but the long-term survival of the prosthesis is lower. Among the factors affecting the survival rate of UKA prosthesis, the position of the prosthesis is one of the important factors, so it is crucial to choose the appropriate position of the prosthesis during the surgical procedure. In this study, by searching the keywords "unicompartmental knee arthroplasty", "fixedbearing", "prosthesis", "appropriate position" in Pubmed, Medline, Clinical Key, China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), Wanfang, and China Science and Technology Journal Databases(VIP). Relevant literature in recent years was collected and organized. In summary, the femoral prosthesis should be placed in the coronal plane at the center of the femoral condyle, in the sagittal plane between flexion of five degrees and extension of 10°, and in the transverse plane between internal and external rotations of three degrees. The tibial prosthesis can be placed in the coronal plane in a neutral position or in a mildly inverted position, and in the sagittal plane between zero and eight degrees, but the anatomical posterior slope angle of the patient has to be taken into account. In the transverse plane, internal and external rotations of three degrees should be chosen. The difference in height between the preoperative and postoperative joint lines should be limited to less than two minimeters.The above summarization is expected to provide clinicians with a reference to improve the accuracy of prosthesis placement in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and to improve the long-term survival of the prosthesis.

图1 股骨假体在冠状面上的位置 注:实线代表股骨假体中轴线,虚线代表股骨以及胫骨的解剖轴线及其垂直线;角1为假体外翻角度,角2为假体内翻角度Note: the solid line represents the medial axis of the femoral prosthesis, the dashed line represents the anatomical axis of the femur as well as the tibia and its perpendicular line; angle one represents the prosthesis valgus angle,and angle two is the prosthesis varus angle
Figure 1 Position of the femoral prosthesis in the coronal plane
图2 股骨假体在矢状面上的位置 注:实线代表股骨假体中轴线,虚线代表股骨胫骨解剖轴线,角3是股骨假体在矢状面上的过屈角度,角4是股骨假体在矢状面上的过伸角度Note: the solid line represents the median axis of the femoral prosthesis, the dashed line represents the anatomical axis of the femoral tibia, angle three shows the hyperflexion angle of the femoral prosthesis on the sagittal plane,and angle four shows the hyperextension angle of the femoral prosthesis on the sagittal plane
Figure 2 Position of the femoral prosthesis in the sagittal plane
图3 胫骨假体在冠状面上的位置 注:角5为胫骨假体外翻角度,角6为胫骨假体内翻角度;7、8是关节线的高度Note: angle five represents the valgus angle of the tibial prosthesis, angle six represents the varus angle of the tibial prosthesis; angle seven and eight show the height of the joint line
Figure 3 Position of the tibial prosthesis on the coronal plane
图4 胫骨假体在矢状面上的位置 注:角9表示后倾角过大;角10代表后倾角过小Note: angle nine indicates that PTS is too large; angle 10 indicates that PTS is too small
Figure 4 Position of the tibial prosthesis in the sagittal plane
[1]
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention( CDC ). Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults—United States,2005[J]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep,2009,58( 16 ): 421-426.
[2]
Andrianakos AA,Kontelis LK,Karamitsos DG,et al. Prevalence of symptomatic knee,hand,and hip osteoarthritis in Greece. The ESORDIG study[J]. J Rheumatol,2006,33( 12 ): 2507-2513.
[3]
Schraknepper J,Dimitriou D,Helmy N,et al. Influence of patient selection,component positioning and surgeon's caseload on the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2020,140( 6 ): 807-813.
[4]
Zambianchi F,Franceschi G,Rivi E,et al. Does component placement affect short-term clinical outcome in robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?[J]. 2019,101-B( 4 ):435-442.
[5]
Wu K,Lv G,Yin P,et al. Effect of tibial component overhang on survivorship in medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. 2022,37: 188-195.
[6]
Koh YG,Park KM,Kang K,et al. Finite element analysis of the influence of the posterior tibial slope on mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. 2021,29: 116-125.
[7]
Fujita M,Hiranaka T,Mai B,et al. External rotation of the tibial component should be avoided in lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee,2021,30: 70-77.
[8]
Hanada M,Hotta K,Matsuyama Y. Dependence of knee range of motion on the alignment of femoral and tibial components after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2021,31( 2 ): 291-298.
[9]
曾绪雯,杨春喜. 膝关节单髁置换术假体生存率的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志( 电子版 ),2019,13( 5 ): 606-610.
[10]
Rivière C,Harman C,Leong A,et al. Kinematic alignment technique for medial OXFORD UKA: an in-silico study[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2019,105( 1 ): 63-70.
[11]
Ng JP,Fan JCH,Chau WW,et al. Does component axial rotational alignment affect clinical outcomes in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?[J]. 2020,27( 6 ): 1953-1962.
[12]
Park KK,Koh YG,Park KM,et al. Biomechanical effect with respect to the sagittal positioning of the femoral component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Biomed Mater Eng,2019,30( 2 ): 171-182.
[13]
Morales-Avalos R,Perelli S,Raygoza-Cortez K,et al. Fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty provides a lower failure rate than mobile-bearing unicompartimental knee arthroplasty when used after a failed high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and metaanalysis[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2022,30( 9 ):3228-3235.
[14]
Polat AE,Polat B,Gürpinar T,et al. Factors affecting the functional outcome of Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J].Acta Ortop Bras,2020,28( 2 ): 78-83.
[15]
Gulati A,Chau R,Simpson DJ,et al. Influence of component alignment on outcome for unicompartmental knee replacement[J].Knee,2009,16( 3 ): 196-199.
[16]
Kang KT,Son J,Koh YG,et al. Effect of femoral component position on biomechanical outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. 2018,25( 3 ): 491-498.
[17]
任佳轩,陈瑱贤,张静,等. 单髁膝关节置换术股骨部件不同内外侧安装位置的骨肌多体动力学研究[J]. 生物医学工程学杂志,2023,40( 3 ): 508-514,521.
[18]
马鹏程. 单髁置换术固定平台股骨假体不同置入位置的有限元分析[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆医科大学,2022.
[19]
Gill JR,Vermuyten L,Wastnedge E,et al. The effect of component alignment on clinical outcomes in fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. 2021,29: 126-133.
[20]
Woo BJ,Liow MHL,Lo NN,et al. No differences in 10-year clinical outcomes and quality of life between patients with different mediolateral femoral component positions in fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2022,30( 9 ): 3176-3183.
[21]
Dobelle E,Aza A,Avellan S,et al. Implantation of the femoral component relative to the tibial component in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a clinical,radiological,and biomechanical study[J/OL]. 2022,37( 6S ): S82-S87. DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.036.
[22]
Kang KT,Son J,Baek C,et al. Femoral component alignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leads to biomechanical change in contact stress and collateral ligament force in knee joint[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2018,138( 4 ): 563-572.
[23]
Liow MH,Tsai TY,Dimitriou D,et al. Does 3-dimensional in vivo component rotation affect clinical outcomes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?[J]. 2016,31( 10 ): 2167-2172.
[24]
高广涵,曹光磊. 关于牛津单髁胫骨假体覆盖与旋转的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志( 电子版 ),2019,13( 6 ): 745-749.
[25]
Scott CE,Wade FA,Bhattacharya R,et al. Changes in bone density in metal-backed and all-polyethylene medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. 2016,31( 3 ): 702-709.
[26]
Innocenti B,Pianigiani S,Ramundo G,et al. Biomechanical effects of different varus and valgus alignments in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. 2016,31( 12 ): 2685-2691.
[27]
王虎,冯硕,张强,等. 胫骨假体内外翻角对固定平台单髁关节置换后近期疗效的影响[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2024,28( 24 ):3827-3832.
[28]
Iesaka K,Tsumura H,Sonoda H,et al. The effects of tibial component inclination on bone stress after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. J Biomech,2002,35( 7 ): 969-974.
[29]
Woiczinski M,Schröder C,Paulus A,et al. Varus or valgus positioning of the tibial component of a unicompartmental fixedbearing knee arthroplasty does not increase wear[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2020,28( 9 ): 3016-3021.
[30]
Nie Y,Yu Q,Shen B. Impact of tibial component coronal alignment on knee joint biomechanics following fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis[J].Orthop Surg,2021,13( 4 ): 1423-1429.
[31]
Kang KT,Park JH,Koh YG,et al. Biomechanical effects of posterior tibial slope on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using finite element analysis[J]. Biomed Mater Eng,2019,30( 2 ):133-144.
[32]
Suero EM,Citak M,Cross MB,et al. Effects of tibial slope changes in the stability of fixed bearing medial unicompartmental arthroplasty in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees[J]. 2012,19( 4 ): 365-369.
[33]
江发华. 不同后倾角度对固定平台单髁膝关节置换的生物力学影响研究[D]. 衡阳: 南华大学,2020.
[34]
Weber P,Schröder C,Schwiesau J,et al. Increase in the tibial slope reduces wear after medial unicompartmental fixed-bearing arthroplasty of the knee[J/OL]. Biomed Res Int,2015,2015:736826. DOI: 10.1155/2015/736826.
[35]
Takayama K,Matsumoto T,Muratsu H,et al. The influence of posterior tibial slope changes on joint gap and range of motion in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. 2016,23( 3 ): 517-522.
[36]
Kamenaga T,Hiranaka T,Hida Y,et al. Rotational position of the tibial component can decrease bony coverage of the tibial component in Oxford mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J].2019,26( 2 ): 459-465.
[37]
熊守林,屈亚飞,任佳轩,等. 单髁膝关节置换术中假体关节线安装高度误差对衬垫磨损的影响[J]. 生物医学工程学杂志,2023,40( 6 ): 1192-1199.
[38]
Kwon OR,Kang KT,Son J,et al. Importance of joint line preservation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Finite element analysis[J]. J Orthop Res,2017,35( 2 ): 347-352.
[39]
Chatellard R,Sauleau V,Colmar M,et al. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does tibial component position influence clinical outcomes and arthroplasty survival?[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2013,99( 4 Suppl ): S219-S225.
[40]
刘蒙飞,陈刚,史易晗,等. 骨质疏松患者单髁置换过程中股骨假体置入位置优化的有限元分析[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2025,29( 3 ): 464-470.
[41]
范熹微,聂涌,吴元刚,等. 膝关节内侧固定平台单髁假体放置位置优化的有限元分析[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2020,40( 3 ): 169-177.
[42]
Bayoumi T,Burger JA,Zuiderbaan HA,et al. Robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restores estimated prearthritic coronal limb alignment: a retrospective cohort study[J].2023,41: 180-189.
[1] 陈晓玲, 钟永洌, 刘巧梨, 李娜, 张志奇, 廖威明, 黄桂武. 超高龄髋膝关节术后谵妄及心血管并发症风险预测[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 575-584.
[2] 马桥桥, 张传开, 郭开今, 蒋涛, 王子豪, 刘勇, 郝亮. 可降解止血粉减少初次全膝关节置换术失血量的研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 585-589.
[3] 刘鹏, 罗天, 许珂媛, 邓红美, 李瑄, 唐翠萍. 八段锦对膝关节炎疗效的初步步态分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 590-595.
[4] 李焕玺, 何淳诺, 田志敏, 周胜虎, 吴昊越, 张浩强. 全膝关节置换术后股骨远端假体周围骨折治疗现状[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 630-637.
[5] 杨滢甄, 黄子荣, 梁家敏, 黄晓芳, 胡艳, 朱伟民. 膝关节前交叉韧带重建术前康复治疗的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 538-544.
[6] 庄若语, 杭明辉, 李文华, 张霆, 侯炜. 膝骨关节炎半定量磁共振评分研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 545-552.
[7] 丁莹莹, 宋恺, 金姬延, 田华. 机器人辅助膝髋关节置换术后精细化临床护理[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 553-557.
[8] 孔德铭, 刘铮, 李睿, 钱文伟, 王飞, 蔡道章, 柴伟. 人工智能辅助全髋关节置换三维术前规划准确性评价[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 431-438.
[9] 赵飞鸿, 陈颖杰, 林静芳, 郑晓春, 廖燕凌. 超声引导下周围神经阻滞对髋膝关节置换术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 457-468.
[10] 任俊筱, 浦路桥, 王志豪, 施洪鑫, 刘爱峰, 齐保闯, 徐永清, 李川. 机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的临床疗效对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 469-476.
[11] 李志文, 李远志, 李华, 方志远. 糖皮质激素治疗膝骨关节炎疗效的网状Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 484-496.
[12] 茹江英, 廖启宇, 温国洪, 潘思华, 刘栋, 张皓琛, 牛云飞. 直接前方入路和后外侧入路半髋关节置换治疗老年痴呆股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 287-293.
[13] 高广涵, 张耀南, 石磊, 王林, 王飞, 郑子天, 王鸿禹, 郭民政, 薛庆云. 膝骨关节炎患者前交叉韧带功能影像学影响因素分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 301-307.
[14] 王浩汀, 尚运涛, 曹光, 张延祠, 李军勇. 胫骨高位截骨联合关节镜与单髁置换治疗单间室膝关节骨性关节炎的临床疗效比较[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 229-236.
[15] 于晓光, 秦永辉, 李佳, 贾国兴, 李军, 赵振栓, 刘国彬. 人工单髁置换术治疗膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎合并前交叉韧带功能不良的近期疗效[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 337-342.
阅读次数
全文


摘要